Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Iowa to Combine Wind Energy & Compressed Air Storage Technology

Iowa to Combine Wind Energy & CAES Technology:
Renewable Energy Access -- Jan 12, 2007
"75-150 megawatt wind farm with Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) technology."
Posted by Jeff Goettemoeller at 10:44 AM

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Since wind is 95% off-peak, storage is essential.

Consider TES.

Demand and supply are the major components of the cost of electricity. If we lower peak demand, supply will increase and the cost of power will fall significantly.

The primary method available to reduce demand is to make ice when electricity is cheap. Melt the ice for air conditioning when electricity is expensive or in high demand. This is a simple alternative to spending billions building new coal fired electric power plants.

Thermal Energy Storage, TES systems have been in use in Texas since the 1920’s in Dallas when three churches installed systems. One of the original applications was to use a small inexpensive compressor to make ice all week long and then melt all that ice to cool the sanctuary for two hours on Sunday. A common TES system is using tank type water heaters (hot thermal storage) to avoid large instantaneous gas or electric water heaters.

So why don’t we find a TES air conditioner in every house and small business? The answer is also simple:
• Most electric rates are averaged so it is not less expensive to buy electricity when it should be cheap and it is not more expensive to buy electricity in high demand periods when the price should be exponentially higher.
• In very round numbers it costs thousands of dollars per kW (or ton of A/C) to fund the construction of electric generation plants, transmission and distribution (TD) infrastructure. There are no mechanisms to divert funds from coal fired generators to funding TES systems in your home or business. The current conservative estimate of avoided costs to build generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure is $1000. per kW per year. This adds up to more than $45,000. over the 15 year life of a 3 ton TES system.
Should we invest $45,000 in new coal generating plants or invest a fraction of that in your home TES system?

If the above economic rationalization isn’t enough to convince you, consider the following additional benefits on TES.
• Running your air conditioner at night to make ice for daytime use is much more efficient because the ambient outside temperature is much lower and you’re a/c unit operates more efficiently.
• Running the generating turbine at night is much more efficient for the same reason, lower nighttime temperatures.
• All power plants run more efficiently when they are fully loaded and demand is predictable.
• Transmission and distribution is more efficient at night.
A massive deployment of TES will postpone the need to build additional power plants for many years and lower the cost of power for consumers. We can land on the moon. Why can’t we make ice?



Consider TES

9:32 AM
Jeff Goettemoeller said...

This is the first I've heard of making ice at off peak hours for cooling later in the day. It sound interesting. I wonder how it compares in terms of efficiency vs. other storage alternatives such as batteries or fuel cells. For this approach to be financially doable, we would need a change in the way we are charged for electricity, of course.

9:53 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)